Clinicalsolutions.co.za
issue 2 February 2015
Editorial: Where do we
Draw the Line
TNE Making a Splash
Clinical Conference 2015
Physiotherapy Associates is
Where do we Draw the Line?
A Pain Story From Israel
I am at one of those points in my professional
life once more and ask what is the meaning
Course Schedule 2014/2015
of things? Throughout my career, I have been
privileged to be exposed, taught and shaped by
some of the most influential minds of our time
in the physical therapy world. These exposures
have culminated in a unique perspective on
Test-retest reliability of pain
human pain and suffering, via the lenses of
neuroscience. As I ponder my growth, I reflect
Prognosis in patients with
chronic non-specific LBP
on a constant in my daily thoughts and ask at
what point do we cross the line? Where should What used to work stopped working, likely
Pharmacologic interventions
we draw the ethical compass when it comes to due to me not pushing hard enough. Talk about
for knee osteoarthritis
treating people who suffer, especially people wheels coming off…I was still convinced
with persistent pain? I'll explain more at the end that the Maitland Approach was superior and
Predictive factors of chronic
– but for now…a historical (Adriaan) view of all I needed was to try harder and be better at
physical therapy.
it and get a good run of normal patients again.
Postoperative pain after total
PHASE 1: TEACHErS AND MAITLAND
Although challenged in this phase, I was still
My training was incredible. As I travel the globe convinced what I was doing was right and many
and experience various people's "upbringing" in others were wrong.
Pharmacotherapy for neuro-
PT, I revel in my original school training. Our
pathic pain in adults
PHASE 3: GIFForD'S MATurE orGANISM
training was intense and focused on the minutia
MoDEL
Trends in opioid analgesic abuse
of the Maitland Concept: "Find it; fix it". I No hyperbole here – while attending a
remember the first few years treating people. Mobilization of the Nervous System course
Baseline pain intensity in individu-
The Concept worked and clinically I was fixing
als with DrF
the world. The important issue is that I had a
continued on next page
singular view of PT and musculoskeletal pain
National trends in the surgical
and what I did was RIGHT and everything
treatment for lumbar DDD
else was WRONG, especially PT's having the
audacity to bend people backwards! This was
opioids for low back pain
simple – black and white.
PHASE 2: IT DoES NoT Work!
The second phase encompassed many failures.
Look for a Big
ANNouNCEMENT FroM
Adriaan Louw PT, PhD, CSMT
ispinstitute.com 1
in Dallas, TX, David Butler presented constantly inundated with such questions are prevalent in our profession, such as SI
Gifford's Mature Organism Model. Five at courses – what do you think of the [xxx joint positional faults, or restoring posture,
minutes into the class I was hooked. name] approach. As a scientist, I know weak abdominals and so forth.
Finally – a model that made sense. This what the evidence tells me and it would
was a larger view of pain allowing various thus be easy to dismiss a certain approach. What sparked this editorial? Recently I
issues into a patient's pain experience, I usually, and likely correctly, answer that was confronted with this exact issue by
such as culture, past experiences, all approaches are tools, aimed to facilitate a therapist I know quite well. He seems
memories, etc. Although glued together change and could at the right time and with to have it all together – sharp as a whip;
via Maitland clinical reasoning, this model the right patient have a tremendous effect. well-read in terms of pain science and at a
allowed more freedom and in general a This now has brought me to a cross-road.
recent course a true pleasure having in the
more rounded and open approach to the
audience and worst of all….so young! He
suffering person sitting in front of me. This
PHASE 4 (?) THE CroSS roAD is likely to be a superstar one day for sure.
was the start of a greyer phase. Suddenly At what point to we have to use a moral, He was ranting and raving over a course
definite yes and no was replaced by maybe, ethical compass? Pain science education he attended and in many ways believed
or I don't know, but sounds probable. This aims to help people understand more about that what he has "found" is the holy grail
model has since culminated in taking on the biology and physiology of pain. This is of treating people with pain. Not only does
the brain, complex neurobiology, my own correct. What people often forget is that the approach being offered fail to provide
studies and a PhD. What a great place to be pain education often includes unlearning any clinical or biological evidence, but the
– anything and everything we do works, as previous faulty beliefs. We spend quite a approach will no doubt foster and likely
long as we can reason it…
bit of time helping patients see that various entrench poor beliefs in people who hurt
beliefs they have are incorrect and likely and are in desperate need of help:
I'll use a controversial example - not a major source of their pain experience.
craniosacral therapy. On every scientific A good example is the old bulging disc Good posture = no/little pain
level craniosacral therapy fails, including model. No amount of information on Bad posture = lots of pain
clinical trials and animal studies sensitive nerves, stress biology and how
examining cranial sutures and more. the brain deals with threat wil help Not only have we shown this assumption
Skeptical readers can consult Tim Flynn's a patient who TRULY BELIEVES to have a very poor correlation, therapists
editorial in JOSPT a few years ago. From they have pain due to the bulging disc. cannot agree over what constitutes or
a neuroscience perspective, my newfound Pain education thus first (often) undoes how to assess posture (See for example
grey perspective would argue that a well-
these beliefs, and then embarks on the O'Sullivan in Manual Therapy Journal),
meaning therapist that listens to a patient patient's reconceptualization of pain. This but I must wonder how this educational
and truly cares will create a safe, healing then brings me to the main point of the model may make his patients….worse. So
and accepting environment. Mix in it editorial: at what point is your approach I am humbly asking our readers to help an
hands-on (craniosacral) treatment and it not only not helping but fueling incorrect old, not-so-smart neuroscience researcher
may indeed provide a catalyst for recovery. beliefs in your patient? Sure it may help and clinician answer the questions: where
The mechanism is likely to include a little – for a while - but may over time do we draw the line? Where is it ethically
various cognitive influences such as fear become so entrenched it cripples a patient immoral to do this? Please let me know.
reduction, acceptance and more. I am for life! In my opinion, several of these
Come join us at CSM 2015 in indianapolis Booth #1544
In just a few days the APTA's annual
Combined Sections Meeting will be held
in Indianapolis, IN. Come join ISPI for a
fun-filled week of learning, socialization,
fun, friendship and discussion. Stop by
the ISPI booth where you can talk to ISPI
faculty, staff and fellow therapists.
TNE Making a Splash…in the right Place!
At our pain classes people often bring
up the issue of: How do we get doc-
tors onboard with TNE? One part of
the process is having them view and
become aware of the evidence.
In December 2011 we published a sys-
tematic review of pain neuroscience
education, which has gained a lot of
interest in the physical therapy world.
What may be uplifting for therapists
to know is that the paper has been a
"hot commodity" in the medical world
and since 2012 been in the top 25 most tor, Archives publishes more articles tation Reports. What's even more im-
downloaded papers in The Archives of annually than any other rehabilitation pressive is that the paper has moved
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation journal, and is the most highly cited up this past year from number 23 to
as calculated by article downloads on journal in the Rehabilitation category number 11!
SciVerse ScienceDirect. Per the edi-
of the Thomson Reuters Journal Ci-
ispinstitute.com 3
Test-retest reliability
participated. Each patient shaded two in CNP. There was no relation between
of pain extent and pain
consecutive PDs using a digital tablet. pain extent and the level of distress or
Software was developed to quantify cognitive function.
location using a novel
the pain extent, to analyse the pain
overlap between PDs and to produce
CoNCLuSIoNS: A novel method for
method for pain drawing pain frequency maps. Correlations the acquisition of PD was presented.
were obtained between pain extent Test-retest reliability of reporting pain
and clinical features including the extent and pain location was supported
Eur J Pain. 2015 Jan 6. doi: 10.1002/ejp.636
level of pain intensity, disability, and in people with CNP and CLBP.
psychological distress and cognitive Future research is needed to establish
Pain drawings (PDs) are an important function.
psychometric properties of PD.
component of the assessment of a
patient with pain. The aim of this work
rESuLTS: The intraclass correlation
is to present the test-retest reliability of a
coefficients for pain extent in CLBP
novel method of quantifying the extent and CNP were very high: 0.97 (95%
and location of pain. Additionally, the CI: 0.95-0.98) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87-
association between PD variables and 0.98), respectively. The Bland Altman
clinical features in patients with chronic
showed a mean difference close to
neck pain (CNP) and chronic low back zero: 5.4% pixels in CNP group and 3%
pain (CLBP) was explored.
pixels in the CLBP group. Significant
correlations were observed between
METHoDS: Fifty-one patients with pain extent and pain intensity in CLBP
CLBP and 56 patients with CNP and CNP and pain extent and disability
Prognosis and course of pain in patients with chronic non-specific
low back pain: A 1-year follow-up cohort study.
Eur J Pain. 2015 Jan 6. doi: 10.1002/ejp.633.
BaCkgroUND: It remains unclear
rESuLTS: Patient-reported intensity
to what extent patients recover from of back pain decreased from 55.5 (SD
chronic non-specific low back pain 23.0) at baseline to 37.0 (SD 23.8), 35.3
(NSLBP). The objective of this study (SD 26.1) and 32.3 (SD 26.9) at 2-, 5-
was to determine (1) the course of and 12-month follow-up, respectively.
chronic NSLBP in tertiary care and Younger age, back pain at baseline, no
(2) which factors predicted 5- and psychological/physical dysfunction
12-month outcomes.
(Symptom Check List-90, item 9), and
higher baseline scores on the physical
METHoDS: This prospective study component scale and mental component
includes 1760 chronic NSLBP patients scale of quality of life (Short Form-36)
from a rehabilitation clinic (mean age were positively associated with recovery
40.1 years, SD 10.6). After baseline at 5 and 12 months. At 5-month follow-
measurement, patients followed a up, higher work participation at baseline
2-month multidisciplinary therapy was also a prognostic factor for both
program; evaluation took place at 2, 5 definitions of recovery. At 12-month
and 12 months post baseline. Recovery
follow-up, having co-morbidity was
was defined as (1) relative recovery predictive for both definitions.
[30% improvement on the pain, visual
analogue scale (VAS) compared with
CoNCLuSIoN: The results of this
baseline] and (2) absolute recovery study indicate that in chronic NSLBP
(VAS pain ≤ 10 mm). The multivariate patients, bio-psychosocial prognostic
logistic regression analysis included factors may be important for clinicians
23 baseline characteristics.
when predicting recovery in back pain
intensity during a 1-year period.
ispinstitute.com 4
Comparative Effectiveness of Pharmacologic Interventions
for knee osteoarthritis: A Systematic review and Network
Meta-analysis Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):46-54
BaCkgroUND: The relative efficacy
DATA SourCES: MEDLINE, EM-
en, celecoxib, intra-articular (IA) cor-
of available treatments of knee os-
BASE, Web of Science, Google ticosteroids, IA hyaluronic acid, oral
teoarthritis (OA) must be determined Scholar, Cochrane Central Register placebo, and IA placebo.
for rational treatment algorithms to be of Controlled Trials from inception
through 15 August 2014, and unpub-
DATA EXTrACTIoN: Two reviewers
lished data.
independently abstracted study data
PurPoSE: To examine the efficacy of
and assessed study quality. Standard-
treatments of primary knee OA using a
STuDY SELECTIoN: Randomized tri-
ized mean differences were calculat-
network meta-analysis design, which als of adults with knee OA comparing ed for pain, function, and stiffness at
estimates relative effects of all treat-
2 or more of the following: acetamin-
3-month follow-up.
ments against each other.
ophen, diclofenac, ibuprofen, naprox-
DATA SYNTHESIS: Network me-
ta-analysis was performed using a
Bayesian random-effects model; 137
studies comprising 33 243 participants
were identified. For pain, all interven-
tions significantly outperformed oral
placebo, with effect sizes from 0.63
continued on page 11
Prevalence and Predictive Factors of Chronic Postsurgical Pain
and Poor Global recovery one Year after outpatient Surgery
Clin J Pain. 2015 Jan 6
oBJECTiVES: To prospectively the Global Surgical Recovery Index preoperative and acute postoperative
describe the prevalence and predictive (GSR) was defined as poor global quality of life, and follow-up surgery
factors of chronic postsurgical pain recovery.
during the first postoperative year.
(CPSP) and poor global recovery
in a large outpatient population at
rESuLTS: 908 patients were included.
DISCuSSIoN: Moderate to severe
a university hospital, one year after The prevalence of moderate to CPSP after outpatient surgery
outpatient surgery.
severe preoperative pain was 37.7%, is common, and should not be
acute postsurgical pain 26.7%, underestimated. Patients at risk for
METHoDS: A prospective longitudinal and CPSP 15.3%. Risk factors for developing CPSP can be identified
cohort study was performed. During the development of CPSP were during the preoperative phase.
eighteen months, patients presenting surgical specialty, preoperative pain,
for preoperative assessment were preoperative analgesic use, acute
invited to participate. Outcome postoperative pain, surgical fear, lack
parameters were measured by using of optimism and poor preoperative
questionnaires at three time points: quality of life. The prevalence of
one week preoperatively, four poor global recovery was 22.3%.
days postoperatively and one year Risk factors for poor global recovery
postoperatively. A value of >3 on an were recurrent surgery because of
11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) the same pathology, preoperative
was considered to indicate moderate pain, preoperative analgesic use,
to severe pain. A score of ≤80% on surgical fear, lack of optimism, poor
ispinstitute.com 5
isPi Clinical Conference 2015:
every Joint has a brain
June 19, 20 & 21, 2015
Hilton Minneapolis/Bloomington, MN
Come learn to unlock the
CHALLENGES
of treating
CHroNIC PAIN via the brain
using hands-on, educational
and sensorimotor approaches.
our GrEAT LINE uP oF SPEAkErS For 2015:
César Fernández de las Peñas PT, DO, PhD (Spain)
Ina Diener PT, PhD (South Africa)
Sandy Hilton PT, DPT, MS
Louie Puentedura PT, DPT, PhD, OCS, GDMT, CSMT, FAAOMPT
Adriaan Louw PT, PhD, CSMT
Christopher Powers PhD, PT, FAPTA
Paul Mintken PT, DPT, OCS, FAAOMPTSteve Forbush PT, PhD
Steve Schmidt PT, M.Phys, OCS, FAAOMPT
Early Bird rates are
Pre-surgical assessment of temporal summation of pain
predicts the development of chronic postoperative pain 12
months after total knee replacement.
Pain. 2015 Jan;156(1):55-61Patients with knee osteoarthritis fore surgery (P = 0.009) and 12 months
demonstrate decreased pressure pain after surgery (P < 0.001).
thresholds (PPTs), facilitated tempo-
ral summation (TS) of pain, and de-
The PPTs of the low-pain groups
creased conditioned pain modulation were normalized for all measurement
(CPM) compared with healthy con-
sites comparing pre-surgery with 12
trols. This study aimed to correlate months post-surgery (P < 0.05, contra
preoperative PPTs, TS, and CPM with lateral arm: P = 0.059), which was not
the development of chronic postoper-
the case for the high-pain group. The
ative pain after total knee replacement low-pain group showed a functional
inhibitory CPM preoperatively and
12 months postoperatively (P < 0.05),
Knee pain intensity (visual analog which was not found in the high-pain
scale [VAS]: 0-10), PPTs, TS, and group. The high-pain group had high-
ate-to-severe pain had pro-nocicep-
CPM were collected before, 2 months, er facilitated TS preoperatively and tive changes compared with patients
and 12 months after TKR. Patients 12 months postoperatively compared who developed mild pain post-sur-
were divided into a low-pain (VAS < with the low-pain group (P < 0.05). gery. Preoperative TS level correlated
3) and a high-pain (VAS ≥ 3) group Preoperative TS level correlated to with the postoperative pain intensity
based on their VAS 12 months after 12-month postoperative VAS (R = and may be a preoperative mechanis-
TKR. The high-pain group (N = 17) 0.240, P = 0.037).
tic predictor for the development of
had higher pain intensities compared
chronic postoperative pain in patients
with the low-pain group (N = 61) be-
Patients who developed moder-
with osteoarthritis after TKR.
Our Newest Patient Pain Resource Guide
This book, written by physical therapist and clinical neuroscience researcher
Adriaan Louw, reveals how your body and its nervous system react before and
after knee replacement.
It is written in an easy-to-read format with illustrations for better understanding.
It shows how nerves experience the procedure, explains why pain is normal
and helps you learn to calm extra-sensitive nerves and reduce pain.
Illustrated. Softcover; 32 pages.
For more information, contact OPTP: www.optp.com 888.819.0121
Now Hiring!
Now Hiring!
Dedicated to outpatient physical & occupational rehabilitation, orthotics and prosthetic services, our family of facilities serves millions of patients across the country. Each day we
ices, our family of facilities serves millions of patients across the country. Each day we
look to enhance our patient's quality of life and exceed the expectations of al those we
h.
are now hiring for:
hir sing for:
• Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Mul •
ti- C
• Greater Chicago Area
• Wausau, Wisconsin
rs ichigan
Ra
api
pd
is
I
tnpatient)
t npatient)
(Ortho Pediatrics, Inpatient)
• Des Moines, Iowa
Move your career forward with the leader in outpatient physical therapy services!
Together, we can change lives.
Move your career forward with the leader in outpatient physical therapy services!
Together, we can change lives.
Brett Raasch, Regional Vice President
Tasha Weir, Recruiter
Brett Raasch,515.
PHArMACoTHErAPY For NEuroPATHIC PAIN IN ADuLTS:
a SySTEMaTiC rEViEw aND METa-aNaLySiS
Lancet Neurol. 2015 Jan 6. pii: S1474-4422(14)70251-0
BaCkgroUND: New drug treatments,
METHoDS: Between April, 2013, was calculated with the fixed-effects
clinical trials, and standards of and January, 2014, NeuPSIG of the Mantel-Haenszel method.
quality for assessment of evidence International Association for the Study
justify an update of evidence-
of Pain did a systematic review and
FINDINGS: 229 studies were included
based recommendations for the meta-analysis of randomized, double-
in the meta-analysis. Analysis of
pharmacological treatment of blind studies of oral and topical publication bias suggested a 10%
neuropathic pain. Using the Grading pharmacotherapy for neuropathic overstatement of treatment effects.
of Recommendations Assessment, pain, including studies published in Studies published in peer-reviewed
Development, and Evaluation peer-reviewed journals since January, journals reported greater effects
(GRADE), we revised the Special 1966, and unpublished trials retrieved than did unpublished studies (r2
Interest Group on Neuropathic Pain from ClinicalTrials.gov and websites 9•3%, p=0•009). Trial outcomes
(NeuPSIG) recommendations for the of pharmaceutical companies. We were generally modest: in particular,
pharmacotherapy of neuropathic pain used number needed to treat (NNT) for
combined NNTs were 6•4 (95% CI
based on the results of a systematic 50% pain relief as a primary measure
review and meta-analysis.
and assessed publication bias; NNT
continued on page 12
Trends in opioid analgesic abuse and mortality in the united States
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 15;372(3):241-8
BaCkgroUND: The use of The programs gather data from diversion and abuse of prescription
prescription opioid medications has drug-diversion investigators, poison opioid medications increased between
increased greatly in the United States centers, substance-abuse treatment 2002 and 2010 and plateaued or
during the past two decades; in 2010, centers, and college students.
decreased between 2011 and 2013.
there were 16,651 opioid-related
These findings suggest that the United
deaths. In response, hundreds of
rESuLTS: Prescriptions for opioid States may be making progress
federal, state, and local interventions analgesics increased substantially in controlling the abuse of opioid
have been implemented. We describe from 2002 through 2010 in the United analgesics. (Funded by the Denver
trends in the diversion and abuse of States but then decreased slightly Health and Hospital Authority.)
prescription opioid analgesics using from 2011 through 2013. In general,
data through 2013.
RADARS System programs reported
large increases in the rates of opioid
METHoDS: We used five programs diversion and abuse from 2002 to
from the Researched Abuse, Diversion,
2010, but then the rates flattened or
and Addiction-Related Surveillance decreased from 2011 through 2013.
(RADARS) System to describe The rate of opioid-related deaths rose
trends between 2002 and 2013 in the and fell in a similar pattern. Reported
diversion and abuse of all products nonmedical use did not change
and formulations of six prescription significantly among college students.
opioid analgesics: oxycodone,
hydrocodone, hydromorphone,
CoNCLuSIoNS: Post-marketing
fentanyl, morphine, and tramadol. surveillance indicates that the
ispinstitute.com 9
Baseline Pain intensity is a Predictor of Chronic Pain in individuals with Distal radius fracture
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Jan 8:1-30
continue to experience wrist/hand operating characteristic (ROC)
pain and functional impairments even curves examined the sensitivity/
1 year after DRF. Early identification specificity of baseline pain intensity in
of individuals at risk of these adverse predicting chronic pain and functional
outcomes can facilitate the delivery of impairment.
required interventions to mitigate the risk.
rESuLTS: Required data was
METHoDS: Data for the Patient-
available for 386 individuals.
STuDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) (for Baseline pain intensity was found to
both the pain and function scales of be a strong predictor of chronic pain
PRWE) at baseline and 1 year after explaining 22% of the variance. A
oBJECTiVE: This study examined DRF, age, sex, injury to the dominant baseline score of 35 (out of 50) on
whether baseline pain intensity is a side, presence of comorbidity, the pain subscale of the PRWE had
predictor of chronic pain and wrist/
education level, mechanism of the best sensitivity/specificity cut-off
hand functions at 1 year following fracture, smoking status, fall history, values (85/79) for predicting chronic
distal radius fracture (DRF). The or energy of fracture were extracted pain at 1 year after DRF.
study also examined the cut-off level from an existing dataset. Multivariate
for baseline pain intensity that was regression analysis examined the
CoNCLuSIoN: Rehabilitation prac-
best predictive of chronic pain.
utility of baseline pain intensity and titioners may be able to use the score
the above variables in predicting of >35/50 on the PRWE Pain Scale to
BaCkgroUND: Many individuals pain and functional status at 1 year screen individuals at risk of chronic
in individuals with DRF. Receiver pain following DRF.
National trends in the surgical treatment for lumbar degenerative disc disease:
united States, 2000 to 2009. Spine J. 2015 Feb 1;15(2):265-71
BaCkgroUND CoNTEXT: Surgical or older with primary diagnosis of
treatment for lumbar degenerative disc lumbar/lumbosacral DDD who under-
disease (DDD) remains controversial. went surgical treatment were included.
Options include anterior lumbar inter-
body fusion, posterior approach fusion
ouTCoME MEASurES: Trends in the
procedures such as posterior lumbar surgical treatment for lumbar DDD.
interbody fusion (PLIF) and postero-
lateral lumbar fusion (PLF), anterior
METHoDS: Clinical data were derived
and posterior lumbar fusion (APLF), from the NIS between 2000 and 2009.
and total disc replacement (TDR). Patients aged 18 years or older with
However, the trends during the last a primary diagnosis of lumbar/lum-
decade are uncertain.
bosacral DDD who underwent spinal fold and PLIF/PLF increased 2.8-fold.
fusion or TDR were identified. Data Total disc replacement did not increase
PurPoSE: To examine the trends regarding patient- and health care sys-
significantly. Anterior lumbar inter-
in the surgical treatment for lumbar tem-related characteristics were re-
body fusion was performed in 16.8%
DDD on a national level.
trieved and analyzed.
of patients, PLIF/PLF in 67.9%, APLF
in 13.6%, and TDR in 1.8%. Surgical
STuDY DESIGN: A retrospective anal-
rESuLTS: A total of 380,305 patients treatment for lumbar DDD was 1.8
ysis of population-based national hos-
underwent surgical treatment for lum-
times more common in the Midwest
pital discharge data collected for the bar DDD between 2000 and 2009. Pop-
region and 1.7 times more common in
Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS).
ulation adjusted incidence increased the South region than in the Northeast
PATIENT SAMPLE: In the NIS from 2.4-fold from 2000 to 2009. Among region. Total disc replacement was
2000 to 2009, patients aged 18 years the procedures, APLF increased 3.0-
continued on next page
ispinstitute.com 10
A Pain Story from Israel knee osteoarthritis
continued from page 5for the most efficacious treatment (hy-
In the past 3 years I have had the privi-
pital he kept complaining that his knee aluronic acid) to 0.18 for the least ef-
lege to travel to/from Israel. All over the hurts really badly. No pain whatsoever ficacious treatment (acetaminophen).
world people are interested in learning around the mess the bullets made. He For function, all interventions except
more about pain. An Israeli PT friend, actually called his mom and told her he IA corticosteroids were significantly
Nirit, sent me this and we thought it may was OK, but thought he injured his knee. superior to oral placebo. For stiffness,
be worth sharing. It's a beautiful pain In the ER he told the physicians the same most of the treatments did not signifi-
story about endogenous mechanisms, and insisted no pain around the horrific cantly differ from one another.
memory and attention – Adriaan.
injury. None! He was treated at the hos-
pital where I work. All through recovery
LIMITATIoN: Lack of long-term data,
About a year ago I saw a 20 y old guy his leg bothered him more than anything inadequate reporting of safety data,
for a consultation. The usual anterior else and otherwise he was much less possible publication bias, and few
knee pain which got better with physio painful then could be expected. It was as head-to-head comparisons.
but he was worried of future damage if the original inhibition attenuated the
etc. His aunt was a patient of mine. She later reaction. He is now at our outpa-
CoNCLuSIoN: This method allowed
was a really bad CRPS patient who fully tient rehab. Lately it seems an orthope-
comparison of common treatments of
recovered so she told him to see me so dist has been putting nonsense into his knee OA according to their relative ef-
I can tell him what's going on. We did mind regarding his back injury. Today ficacy. Intra-articular treatments were
that, he was happy and did not need fur-
he came in and told me he has a really superior to nonsteroidal anti-inflam-
ther treatment.
bad back pain using "worried", "afraid matory drugs, possibly because of the
" and such descriptives. So I told him integrated IA placebo effect. Small
why he has many good reasons for back but robust differences were observed
pain (neuroscience reasons of course), between active treatments. All treat-
what it means and no reason to worry. ments except acetaminophen showed
He wasn't sure so I did my favorite trick clinically significant improvement
which is asked people around us, phys-
from baseline pain. This information,
ios and patients, if they had back pain along with the safety profiles and rela-
in the last month. Of course everybody tive costs of included treatments, will
said yes. So he said he got it, turned to be helpful for individualized patient
his physio and asked for the session to care decisions.
focus on back exercise. He is a sweet
kid, with good sense of humor and an
Two months ago he was shot by a ter-
amazing pain story which he gave per-
National Surgical Trends
rorist. Close range, 3 bullets shattering mission for me and "all physios" to tell continued from page 10
his vena cava, hitting a vertebra with no anyone who might be interested or not. more common in younger patients and
large damage but very small bone frag-
He even offered to add his picture as in the Northeast region. Poterior lum-
ments all around, shrapnel all over his in-
he is "so good looking". Those patients bar interbody fusion/PLF was more
ternal organs. Luckily for him the whole make what we do fun and so interesting.
common in older patients and in the
mess pressed on his vena cava
South region.
stopping massive bleeding up
until he was in the operating
CoNCLuSIoNS: During the last de-
room. It was still touch and go
cade, surgical treatment for lumbar
but his life was saved and after
DDD has increased 2.4-fold in the
3 further operations he got on
United States. Although all fusion pro-
with his recovery. Altogether
cedures significantly increased, TDR
he got 43 blood transfusions!
did not increase. Surgical treatment
for lumbar DDD was more common
The amazing thing is that he
in the Midwest and South regions.
did not lose consciousness and
Trends in the procedures were differ-
while he was taken to the hos-
ent depending on the age group and
hospital region.
ispinstitute.com 11
opioids for low back pain Neuropathic Pain in Adults
continued from page 9
BMJ. 2015 Jan 5;350:g6380
5•2-8•4) for serotonin-noradrenaline
reuptake inhibitors, mainly including
duloxetine (nine of 14 studies); 7•7
Back pain affects most adults, causes conditions is about 30%. Given the (6•5-9•4) for pregabalin; 7•2 (5•9-
disability for some, and is a common brevity of randomized controlled 9•21) for gabapentin, including
reason for seeking healthcare. In the trials, the long term effectiveness and gabapentin extended release and
United States, opioid prescription safety of opioids are unknown. Loss enacarbil; and 10•6 (7•4-19•0) for
for low back pain has increased, and of long term efficacy could result capsaicin high-concentration patches.
opioids are now the most commonly from drug tolerance and emergence of NNTs were lower for tricyclic
prescribed drug class. More than half hyperalgesia.
antidepressants, strong opioids,
of regular opioid users report back
tramadol, and botulinum toxin A, and
pain. Rates of opioid prescribing in the Complications of opioid use include undetermined for lidocaine patches.
US and Canada are two to three times addiction and overdose related Based on GRADE, final quality of
higher than in most European countries.
mortality, which have risen in parallel evidence was moderate or high for
with prescription rates. Common short all treatments apart from lidocaine
The analgesic efficacy of opioids term side effects are constipation, patches; tolerability and safety, and
for acute back pain is inferred from nausea, sedation, and increased risk of values and preferences were higher for
evidence in other acute pain conditions. falls and fractures. Longer term side topical drugs; and cost was lower for
Opioids do not seem to expedite return effects may include depression and tricyclic antidepressants and tramadol.
to work in injured workers or improve sexual dysfunction. Screening for high These findings permitted a strong
functional outcomes of acute back pain risk patients, treatment agreements, and recommendation for use and proposal
in primary care. For chronic back pain, urine testing have not reduced overall as first-line treatment in neuropathic
systematic reviews find scant evidence rates of opioid prescribing, misuse, or pain for tricyclic antidepressants,
of efficacy. Randomized controlled overdose.
serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake
trials have high dropout rates, brief
inhibitors, pregabalin, and gabapentin;
duration (four months or less), and Newer strategies for reducing risks a weak recommendation for use and
highly selected patients.
include more selective prescription proposal as second line for lidocaine
of opioids and lower doses; use of patches, capsaicin high-concentration
Opioids seem to have short term prescription monitoring programs; patches, and tramadol; and a weak
analgesic efficacy for chronic back avoidance of co-prescription with recommendation for use and proposal
pain, but benefits for function are sedative hypnotics; and reformulations as third line for strong opioids and
less clear. The magnitude of pain that make drugs more difficult to snort, botulinum toxin A. Topical agents and
relief across chronic non-cancer pain smoke, or inject.
botulinum toxin A are recommended
for peripheral neuropathic pain only.
INTErPrETATIoN: Our results
support a revision of the NeuPSIG
recommendations for the
pharmacotherapy of neuropathic pain.
Inadequate response to drug treatments
constitutes a substantial unmet need in
patients with neuropathic pain. Modest
efficacy, large placebo responses,
heterogeneous diagnostic criteria, and
poor phenotypic profiling probably
account for moderate trial outcomes
and should be taken into account in
future studies.
ispinstitute.com 12
2015 Course schedule
Therapeutic Neuroscience Education: Teaching People About Pain
Therapeutic Neuroscience Education: Educating Patients About Pain
A Study of Neurodynamics: The Body's Loving Alarm System
Spinal Manipulation I: A Physical Therapy Approach
The Whiplash Patient: An Update on Examination & Treatment
The Lower Quadrant: A Differential Diagnosis Approach to Manual Therapy
The Cervical Spine: A Manual Therapy and Pain Science Approach
Spinal Manipulation I: A Physical Therapy Approach
The Thoracic Spine: A Manual Therapy and Pain Science Approach
The Lumbar Spine: A Manual Therapy and Pain Science Approach
The Upper Quadrant: A Differential Diagnosis Approach to Manual Therapy
Therapeutic Neuroscience Education: Educating Patients About Pain
Why Do I Hurt?
(2 hours)
Spinal Manipulation I: A Physical Therapy Approach
A Therapeutic Treatment Approach to Cervicogenic Headaches
Education and Exercise for Fibromyalgia Patients: A Neuroscience Approach
Therapeutic Neuroscience Education: Educating Patients About Pain
Why Do I Hurt? (2 hours)
Too Hot to Handle: Desensitizing the Hypersensitive Patient
The Cervical Spine: A Manual Therapy & Pain Science Approach
Therapeutic Neuroscience Education: Educating Patients About Pain
Therapeutic Neuroscience Education: Educating Patients About Pain
Too Hot to Handle: Desensitizing the Hypersensitive Patient
fri/Sat/Sun Jun 19-22
The Clinical Conference: Every Joint Has a Brain
Spinal Manipulation I: A Physical Therapy Approach
The Thoracic Spine: A Manual Therapy and Pain Science Approach
Fri/Sat/Sun Aug 21-23
Therapeutic Neuroscience Education: Educating Patients About Pain
The Lumbar Spine: A Manual Therapy and Pain Science Approach
Therapeutic Neuroscience Education I: Educating Patients About Pain
A Study of Neurodynamics: The Body's Living Alarm
Fountain Valley, CA
The Upper Quadrant: A Differential Diagnosis Approach to Manual Therapy
A Study of Neurodynamics: The Body's Living Alarm
Philadelphia, PA
A Study of Neurodynamics: The Body's Living Alarm
Elbow, Wrist and Hand, Differential Diagnosis & Management
The Cervical Spine: A Manual Therapy & Pain Science Approach
Courses are still being scheduled, keep checking back if you don't see what you are looking for! If you are interested in hosting a one or two-day class at your facility, contact us.
Source: http://www.clinicalsolutions.co.za/images/uploads/courses/ISPI_February_2015.pdf
Evaluación de DocuMenea, sistema de promoción social de noticias de biblioteconomía y documentación Evaluación de DocuMenea, sistema de promoción social de noticias de biblioteconomía y documentación Por Daniel Torres-Salinas y Javier Guallar Resumen: Uno de los servicios más populares de la Web 2.0 son las plataformas de promoción social de noticias. En el en-torno hispanoamericano quizá el más conocido sea Menéame; utilizando su código abierto se creó DocuMenea con las mis-mas características pero circunscrito exclusivamente al ám-bito de la Biblioteconomía y Documentación. En este trabajo se presenta una evaluación de este servicio desde su creación en noviembre del año 2006 hasta diciembre de 2008. Como resultados se obtiene que se envió un total de 2.166 noticias de las que 1.610 fueron publicadas. El servicio cuenta con 582 usuarios con una participación desigual ya el 74% nunca ha enviado ninguna noticia y el 91% no ha votado en ninguna ocasión. Temáticamente se identificaron cuatro ejes: Google, bibliotecas, redes sociales/web 2.0 y el libro. Finalmente se Daniel Torres-Salinas es
Vol 443 7 September 2006 doi:10.1038/nature05114 The structure of H5N1 avian influenzaneuraminidase suggests newopportunities for drug designRupert J. Russell1†, Lesley F. Haire1, David J. Stevens1, Patrick J. Collins1, Yi Pu Lin1, G. Michael Blackburn2,Alan J. Hay1, Steven J. Gamblin1 & John J. Skehel1 The worldwide spread of H5N1 avian influenza has raised concerns that this virus might acquire the ability to passreadily among humans and cause a pandemic. Two anti-influenza drugs currently being used to treat infected patientsare oseltamivir (Tamiflu) and zanamivir (Relenza), both of which target the neuraminidase enzyme of the virus. Reportsof the emergence of drug resistance make the development of new anti-influenza molecules a priority. Neuraminidasesfrom influenza type A viruses form two genetically distinct groups: group-1 contains the N1 neuraminidase of the H5N1avian virus and group-2 contains the N2 and N9 enzymes used for the structure-based design of current drugs. Here weshow by X-ray crystallography that these two groups are structurally distinct. Group-1 neuraminidases contain a cavityadjacent to their active sites that closes on ligand binding. Our analysis suggests that it may be possible to exploit thesize and location of the group-1 cavity to develop new anti-influenza drugs.